| Title |
Travel bans and scientific mobility: utility of asymmetry and affinity indexes to inform science policy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-018-2738-2 |
| Authors |
Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Yi Bu, Nicolás Robinson-García, Rodrigo Costas, Cassidy R. Sugimoto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Russia | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 16% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Librarian | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 22% |
| Unknown | 14 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 17 | 35% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,177,655
of 25,067,172 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#1,234
of 2,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,651
of 334,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#25
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,067,172 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.