| Title |
Restoration prospects for Heitutan degraded grassland in the Sanjiangyuan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mountain Science, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11629-013-2557-0 |
| Authors |
Xi-lai Li, George L. W. Perry, Gary Brierley, Jay Gao, Jing Zhang, Yuan-wu Yang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 21% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 14% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mountain Science
#54
of 218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,076
of 198,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mountain Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them