| Title |
The effect of health and nutrition education intervention on women's postpartum beliefs and practices: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-9-45 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nian Liu, Limei Mao, Xiufa Sun, Liegang Liu, Ping Yao, Banghua Chen |
| Abstract |
'Sitting month' is the Chinese tradition for postpartum customs. Available studies indicate that some of the traditional postpartum practices are potentially harmful for women's health. However, no intervention study aiming at postpartum practices has been performed. In this paper we evaluated the effect of a health and nutrition education intervention, which focused on improving postpartum dietary quality and optimal health behaviors. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 214 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 11% |
| Researcher | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 46 | 21% |
| Unknown | 48 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 47 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 9% |
| Psychology | 15 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 60 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,932,629
of 23,674,309 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,421
of 15,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,551
of 174,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#19
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,674,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.