↓ Skip to main content

Abrupt Holocene changes of the Asian monsoon at millennial- and centennial-scales: Evidence from lake sediment document in Minqin Basin, NW China

Overview of attention for article published in Science Bulletin, December 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Abrupt Holocene changes of the Asian monsoon at millennial- and centennial-scales: Evidence from lake sediment document in Minqin Basin, NW China
Published in
Science Bulletin, December 2001
DOI 10.1007/bf02901902
Authors

Fahu Chen, Yan Zhu, Jijun Li, Qi Shi, Liya Jin, B. Wünemann

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 2 7%
Germany 1 3%
Austria 1 3%
Unknown 26 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 27%
Researcher 4 13%
Professor 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 60%
Environmental Science 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2014.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Science Bulletin
#698
of 1,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,691
of 132,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Bulletin
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.