↓ Skip to main content

Longitudinal Evaluation of Swallowing with Videofluoroscopy in Patients with Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer After Chemoradiation

Overview of attention for article published in Dysphagia, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Longitudinal Evaluation of Swallowing with Videofluoroscopy in Patients with Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer After Chemoradiation
Published in
Dysphagia, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00455-018-9889-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ekaterini Xinou, Ioannis Chryssogonidis, Anna Kalogera-Fountzila, Dimitra Panagiotopoulou-Mpoukla, Athanasia Printza

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence, severity, and pattern of evolution of swallowing impairments encountered in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients before and after chemoradiation (CRT) with videofluoroscopy of swallowing study (VFSS), using the modified barium swallow impairment profile (MBSImP) protocol and scoring system, and to determine the appropriate time points in which these patients should undergo VFSS post-CRT. A prospective cohort of 69 patients with locally advanced HNC underwent VFSS with the MBSImP protocol at 5 evaluation points: pre-CRT, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-CRT. VFSS was scored with MBSImP, penetration-aspiration scale (PAS), and swallowing performance status (SPS) scale. Statistical analysis was performed only for the 12-month disease-free subset of patients. MBSImP, PAS, and SPS scale scores reached their peak at 3 months post-CRT and improved at 6-12 months, but without returning at pre-treatment levels. Base of tongue retraction, initiation of pharyngeal swallow, epiglottic movement, laryngeal vestibule closure, and laryngeal elevation were the most frequently observed impaired MBSImP components. Epiglottic movement significantly improved (p = 0.009) and laryngeal vestibule closure significantly deteriorated (p = 0.042) over time (Friedman test). Severe swallowing deficits and high aspiration rates are observed in HNC patients pre-CRT, which further deteriorate post-CRT, peak at 3 months, and despite slight improvement, persist over time. We suggest that these patients, regardless of the presence of subjective dysphagia, should undergo VFSS both before and 3 months post-CRT, and also if possible, 1 month post-CRT, in order to facilitate implementation of early swallowing rehabilitation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Master 5 8%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 23 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 16 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 18%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 26 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#13,711,256
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#901
of 1,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,937
of 333,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#20
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.