↓ Skip to main content

The lifestylisation of healthcare? ‘Consumer genomics’ and mobile health as technologies for healthy lifestyle

Overview of attention for article published in Applied and Translational Genomics, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 100)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
17 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The lifestylisation of healthcare? ‘Consumer genomics’ and mobile health as technologies for healthy lifestyle
Published in
Applied and Translational Genomics, February 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.atg.2015.02.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Federica Lucivero, Barbara Prainsack

Abstract

Consumer genomics and mobile health provide health-related information to individuals and offer advice for lifestyle change. These 'technologies for healthy lifestyle' occupy an ambiguous space between the highly regulated medical domain and the less regulated consumer market. We argue that this ambiguity challenges implicit distinctions between what is medical and what is related to personal lifestyle choices within current regulatory systems. In this article, we discuss how consumer genomics and mobile health devices give rise to new ways of creating (and making sense of) health-related knowledge. We also address some of the implications of harnessing, rather than denying, the hybridity of mobile health devices, being situated between medical devices and consumer products, between health and lifestyle.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 171 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Researcher 18 10%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 33 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 31 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 15%
Computer Science 18 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Other 36 21%
Unknown 40 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2021.
All research outputs
#783,875
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Applied and Translational Genomics
#4
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,286
of 367,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied and Translational Genomics
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.