| Title |
A Functional analysis of circadian pacemakers in nocturnal rodents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, October 1976
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01417857 |
| Authors |
Serge Daan, Colin S. Pittendrigh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 27% |
| Researcher | 17 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 17% |
| Unknown | 32 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 34% |
| Neuroscience | 24 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 6% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 37 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,004,087
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#113
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105
of 5,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them