| Title |
Exudation-reabsorption in a mycorrhizal fungus, the dynamic interface for interaction with soil and soil microorganisms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mycorrhiza, October 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s005720050298 |
| Authors |
Yu-Ping Sun, T. Unestam, Steven D. Lucas, Karl Johan Johanson, Lennart Kenne, Roger Finlay |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 20% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 55% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 15 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2014.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Mycorrhiza
#170
of 647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,005
of 34,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycorrhiza
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 647 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them