↓ Skip to main content

Cracking Through Hegemonic Ideology: The Logic of Formal Justice

Overview of attention for article published in Social Justice Research, September 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Cracking Through Hegemonic Ideology: The Logic of Formal Justice
Published in
Social Justice Research, September 2005
DOI 10.1007/s11211-005-6828-0
Authors

Jane Mansbridge

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 11%
Italy 1 6%
Unknown 15 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 28%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 22%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 8 44%
Psychology 4 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,756,967
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Social Justice Research
#115
of 226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,816
of 59,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Justice Research
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.