↓ Skip to main content

Protein backbone chemical shifts predicted from searching a database for torsion angle and sequence homology

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomolecular NMR, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 567)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
20 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
280 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Protein backbone chemical shifts predicted from searching a database for torsion angle and sequence homology
Published in
Journal of Biomolecular NMR, July 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10858-007-9166-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yang Shen, Ad Bax

Abstract

Chemical shifts of nuclei in or attached to a protein backbone are exquisitely sensitive to their local environment. A computer program, SPARTA, is described that uses this correlation with local structure to predict protein backbone chemical shifts, given an input three-dimensional structure, by searching a newly generated database for triplets of adjacent residues that provide the best match in phi/psi/chi(1 )torsion angles and sequence similarity to the query triplet of interest. The database contains (15)N, (1)H(N), (1)H(alpha), (13)C(alpha), (13)C(beta) and (13)C' chemical shifts for 200 proteins for which a high resolution X-ray (< or =2.4 A) structure is available. The relative importance of the weighting factors for the phi/psi/chi(1) angles and sequence similarity was optimized empirically. The weighted, average secondary shifts of the central residues in the 20 best-matching triplets, after inclusion of nearest neighbor, ring current, and hydrogen bonding effects, are used to predict chemical shifts for the protein of known structure. Validation shows good agreement between the SPARTA-predicted and experimental shifts, with standard deviations of 2.52, 0.51, 0.27, 0.98, 1.07 and 1.08 ppm for (15)N, (1)H(N), (1)H(alpha), (13)C(alpha), (13)C(beta) and (13)C', respectively, including outliers.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
France 3 1%
Belgium 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 225 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 27%
Researcher 52 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 21 9%
Student > Master 16 6%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Other 44 18%
Unknown 32 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 76 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 16%
Computer Science 8 3%
Physics and Astronomy 7 3%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 36 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,833,166
of 24,224,854 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomolecular NMR
#39
of 567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,338
of 70,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomolecular NMR
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,224,854 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 567 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them