↓ Skip to main content

CheckShift: automatic correction of inconsistent chemical shift referencing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomolecular NMR, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
CheckShift: automatic correction of inconsistent chemical shift referencing
Published in
Journal of Biomolecular NMR, September 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10858-007-9191-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon W. Ginzinger, Fabian Gerick, Murray Coles, Volker Heun

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 3%
Belgium 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 17%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 33%
Chemistry 6 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 17%
Computer Science 2 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomolecular NMR
#132
of 614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,066
of 71,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomolecular NMR
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 614 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them