↓ Skip to main content

CheckShift improved: fast chemical shift reference correction with high accuracy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomolecular NMR, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
CheckShift improved: fast chemical shift reference correction with high accuracy
Published in
Journal of Biomolecular NMR, July 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10858-009-9330-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon W. Ginzinger, Marko Skočibušić, Volker Heun

Abstract

The construction of a consistent protein chemical shift database is an important step toward making more extensive use of this data in structural studies. Unfortunately, progress in this direction has been hampered by the quality of the available data, particularly with respect to chemical shift referencing, which is often either inaccurate or inconsistently annotated. Preprocessing of the data is therefore required to detect and correct referencing errors. In an earlier study we developed CheckShift, a program for performing this task automatically. Now we spent substantial effort in improving the running time of the CheckShift algorithm, which resulted in an running time decrease of 90%, thereby achieving equivalent quality to the former version of CheckShift. The reason for the running time decrease is twofold. Firstly we improved the search for the optimal re-referencing offset considerably. Secondly, as CheckShift is based on a secondary structure prediction from the amino acid sequence (formally PsiPred was used), we evaluated a wide range of available secondary structure prediction programs focusing on the special needs of the CheckShift algorithm. The results of this evaluation prove empirically that we can use faster secondary structure prediction programs than PsiPred without sacrificing CheckShift's accuracy. Very recently Wang and Markley (2009) gave a small list of extreme outliers of the former version of the CheckShift web-server. Those were due to the empirical reduction of the search space implemented in the old version. The new version of CheckShift now gives very similar results to RefDB and LACS for all outliers mentioned in Table 1 of Wang and Markley (2009).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 8%
Russia 1 8%
Unknown 11 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Unspecified 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomolecular NMR
#132
of 614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,105
of 109,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomolecular NMR
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 614 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.