Title |
Bottom‐up trophic cascades and material transfer in terrestrial food webs
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecological Research, November 2005
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11284-005-0124-z |
Authors |
Hideki Kagata, Takayuki Ohgushi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 5 | 2% |
Argentina | 4 | 2% |
United States | 4 | 2% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Chile | 2 | <1% |
Mexico | 2 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | <1% |
Unknown | 215 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 23% |
Researcher | 43 | 18% |
Student > Master | 29 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 28 | 12% |
Professor | 13 | 5% |
Other | 37 | 15% |
Unknown | 35 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 131 | 55% |
Environmental Science | 47 | 20% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
Other | 2 | <1% |
Unknown | 46 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2017.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Research
#288
of 1,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,179
of 77,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Research
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,019 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.