| Title |
Ionic selectivity revisited: The role of kinetic and equilibrium processes in ion permeation through channels
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Membrane Biology, October 1983
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01870364 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
George Eisenman, Richard Horn |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 31% |
| Researcher | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Professor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 27% |
| Chemistry | 25 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 12% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 9 | 7% |
| Engineering | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,968,506
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Membrane Biology
#60
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#928
of 8,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Membrane Biology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them