| Title |
The reasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
General Relativity and Gravitation, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10714-011-1248-9 |
| Authors |
Alex Harvey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 6 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 16 | 29% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 16% |
| Philosophy | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 24% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from General Relativity and Gravitation
#285
of 1,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,653
of 123,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from General Relativity and Gravitation
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,448 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.