↓ Skip to main content

Boletus roseoflavus, a new species of Boletus in section Appendiculati from China

Overview of attention for article published in Mycological Progress, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Boletus roseoflavus, a new species of Boletus in section Appendiculati from China
Published in
Mycological Progress, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11557-013-0888-4
Authors

Haibo Li, Hailong Wei, Huazheng Peng, Hongmei Ding, Liling Wang, Liang He, Lizhong Fu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Other 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 82%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Mycological Progress
#169
of 541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,001
of 280,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycological Progress
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 541 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.