You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using urban forest assessment tools to model bird habitat potential
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Landscape & Urban Planning, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.10.006 |
| Authors |
Susannah B. Lerman, Keith H. Nislow, David J. Nowak, Stephen DeStefano, David I. King, D. Todd Jones-Farrand |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Taiwan | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 267 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 17% |
| Researcher | 45 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 56 | 20% |
| Unknown | 39 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 94 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 90 | 32% |
| Design | 13 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Unknown | 54 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,959,162
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Landscape & Urban Planning
#1,010
of 2,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,637
of 322,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape & Urban Planning
#14
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.