↓ Skip to main content

Dietary histories of herbivorous loricariid catfishes: evidence from δ13C values of otoliths

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Biology of Fishes, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Dietary histories of herbivorous loricariid catfishes: evidence from δ13C values of otoliths
Published in
Environmental Biology of Fishes, July 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10641-006-9074-8
Authors

Hirofumi Nonogaki, Jay A. Nelson, William P. Patterson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Colombia 3 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 126 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Professor 11 8%
Other 28 21%
Unknown 15 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 63%
Environmental Science 18 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 15 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2014.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Biology of Fishes
#493
of 1,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,810
of 65,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Biology of Fishes
#6
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,763 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.