↓ Skip to main content

Differential Requirement for Nfil3 during NK Cell Development

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Immunology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differential Requirement for Nfil3 during NK Cell Development
Published in
The Journal of Immunology, March 2014
DOI 10.4049/jimmunol.1302605
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cyril Seillet, Nicholas D. Huntington, Pradnya Gangatirkar, Elin Axelsson, Martina Minnich, Hugh J. M. Brady, Meinrad Busslinger, Mark J. Smyth, Gabrielle T. Belz, Sebastian Carotta

Abstract

NK cells can be grouped into distinct subsets that are localized to different organs and exhibit a different capacity to secrete cytokines and mediate cytotoxicity. Despite these hallmarks that reflect tissue-specific specialization in NK cells, little is known about the factors that control the development of these distinct subsets. The basic leucine zipper transcription factor Nfil3 (E4bp4) is essential for bone marrow-derived NK cell development, but it is not clear whether Nfil3 is equally important for all NK cell subsets or how it induces NK lineage commitment. In this article, we show that Nfil3 is required for the formation of Eomes-expressing NK cells, including conventional medullary and thymic NK cells, whereas TRAIL(+) Eomes(-) NK cells develop independently of Nfil3. Loss of Nfil3 during the development of bone marrow-derived NK cells resulted in reduced expression of Eomes and, conversely, restoration of Eomes expression in Nfil3(-/-) progenitors rescued NK cell development and maturation. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that Nfil3 drives the formation of mature NK cells by inducing Eomes expression and reveal the differential requirements of NK cell subsets for Nfil3.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 82 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 34%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 33 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,547,913
of 23,402,852 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Immunology
#1,021
of 27,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,471
of 222,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Immunology
#14
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,402,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.