You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Multi‐centre research in Australia: Analysis of a recent National Health and Medical Research Council‐funded project
|
---|---|
Published in |
Respirology, August 2009
|
DOI | 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2009.01595.x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Timothy J. KIDD, Guy B. MARKS, Peter T.P. BYE, Claire E. WAINWRIGHT, Philip J. ROBINSON, Barbara R. ROSE, Colin HARBOUR, Scott C. BELL, The ACPinCF INVESTIGATORS |
Abstract |
Human research ethics committees provide essential review of research projects to ensure the ethical conduct of human research. Several recent reports have highlighted a complex process for successful application for human research ethics committee approval, particularly for multi-centre studies. Limited resources are available for the execution of human clinical research in Australia and around the world. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Samoa | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 30% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
Student > Master | 2 | 20% |
Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 30% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 10% |
Linguistics | 1 | 10% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,960,693
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Respirology
#1,161
of 2,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,778
of 122,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respirology
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.