Title |
Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Cardiogenic Shock
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC: Heart Failure, April 2018
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.11.017 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mary E. Keebler, Elias V. Haddad, Chun W. Choi, Stuart McGrane, Sandip Zalawadiya, Kelly H. Schlendorf, D. Marshall Brinkley, Matthew R. Danter, Mark Wigger, Jonathan N. Menachem, Ashish Shah, JoAnn Lindenfeld |
Abstract |
Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has emerged as a viable treatment for patients in cardiogenic shock with biventricular failure and pulmonary dysfunction. Advances in pump and oxygenator technology, cannulation strategies, patient selection and management, and durable mechanical circulatory support have contributed to expanded utilization of this technology. However, challenges remain that require investigation to improve outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 177 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 31 | 18% |
Spain | 28 | 16% |
Colombia | 8 | 5% |
Mexico | 8 | 5% |
Brazil | 7 | 4% |
Argentina | 5 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 3% |
Germany | 3 | 2% |
Italy | 3 | 2% |
Other | 21 | 12% |
Unknown | 58 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 124 | 70% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 32 | 18% |
Scientists | 13 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 265 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 35 | 13% |
Researcher | 30 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 9% |
Other | 57 | 22% |
Unknown | 70 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 135 | 51% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 5% |
Engineering | 6 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 1% |
Other | 19 | 7% |
Unknown | 86 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2020.
All research outputs
#370,005
of 25,626,416 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Heart Failure
#81
of 1,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,346
of 343,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Heart Failure
#4
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,626,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.