↓ Skip to main content

Dual Molecular Effects of Dominant RORA Mutations Cause Two Variants of Syndromic Intellectual Disability with Either Autism or Cerebellar Ataxia

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Human Genetics, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dual Molecular Effects of Dominant RORA Mutations Cause Two Variants of Syndromic Intellectual Disability with Either Autism or Cerebellar Ataxia
Published in
American Journal of Human Genetics, April 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.02.021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire Guissart, Xenia Latypova, Paul Rollier, Tahir N. Khan, Hannah Stamberger, Kirsty McWalter, Megan T. Cho, Susanne Kjaergaard, Sarah Weckhuysen, Gaetan Lesca, Thomas Besnard, Katrin Õunap, Lynn Schema, Andreas G. Chiocchetti, Marie McDonald, Julitta de Bellescize, Marie Vincent, Hilde Van Esch, Shannon Sattler, Irman Forghani, Isabelle Thiffault, Christine M. Freitag, Deborah Sara Barbouth, Maxime Cadieux-Dion, Rebecca Willaert, Maria J. Guillen Sacoto, Nicole P. Safina, Christèle Dubourg, Lauren Grote, Wilfrid Carré, Carol Saunders, Sander Pajusalu, Emily Farrow, Anne Boland, Danielle Hays Karlowicz, Jean-François Deleuze, Monica H. Wojcik, Rena Pressman, Bertrand Isidor, Annick Vogels, Wim Van Paesschen, Lihadh Al-Gazali, Aisha Mohamed Al Shamsi, Mireille Claustres, Aurora Pujol, Stephan J. Sanders, François Rivier, Nicolas Leboucq, Benjamin Cogné, Souphatta Sasorith, Damien Sanlaville, Kyle Retterer, Sylvie Odent, Nicholas Katsanis, Stéphane Bézieau, Michel Koenig, Erica E. Davis, Laurent Pasquier, Sébastien Küry

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 126 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 17%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Other 7 6%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 34 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 13%
Neuroscience 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Psychology 6 5%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 43 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2018.
All research outputs
#6,580,752
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#3,091
of 6,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,433
of 346,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#43
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.