↓ Skip to main content

How it all Started: Tau and Protein Phosphatase 2A

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How it all Started: Tau and Protein Phosphatase 2A
Published in
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, January 2013
DOI 10.3233/jad-130503
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chang Liu, Jürgen Götz

Abstract

This review is dedicated to Inge Grundke-Iqbal who laid the foundations of the tau field, by isolating tau from the Alzheimer's disease (AD) brain, discovering that tau is hyperphosphorylated, and proving a critical role of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) and its endogenous inhibitor I2PP2A in this process. This memorial starts with a few personal notes, and then covers how subcellular fractionation helped in isolating tau. We review in detail the role of PP2A and its endogenous inhibitor in tau phosphorylation. We discuss the role that methylation and phosphorylation have in regulating PP2A activity. We add what we have contributed to understanding the role of tau and PP2A in AD using PP2A transgenic and knockout models, and conclude by addressing two underexplored areas in tau research: tau's non-canonical functions and the role distinct tau isoforms have in a physiological context.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Greece 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Neuroscience 6 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
#7,140
of 7,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,432
of 289,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
#172
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.