↓ Skip to main content

Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response

Overview of attention for article published in Genetica, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
878 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
682 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response
Published in
Genetica, August 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mike Goddard

Abstract

Genomic selection refers to the use of dense markers covering the whole genome to estimate the breeding value of selection candidates for a quantitative trait. This paper considers prediction of breeding value based on a linear combination of the markers. In this case the best estimate of each marker's effect is the expectation of the effect conditional on the data. To calculate this requires a prior distribution of marker effects. If the marker effects are normally distributed with constant variance, BLUP can be used to calculate the estimated effects of the markers and hence the estimated breeding value (EBV). In this case the model is equivalent to a conventional animal model in which the relationship matrix among the animals is estimated from the markers instead of the pedigree. The accuracy of the EBV can approach 1.0 but a very large amount of data is required. An alternative model was investigated in which only some markers have non-zero effects and these effects follow a reflected exponential distribution. In this case the expected effect of a marker is a non-linear function of the data such that apparently small effects are regressed back almost to zero and consequently these markers can be deleted from the model. The accuracy in this case is considerably higher than when marker effects are normally distributed. If genomic selection is practiced for several generations the response declines in a manner that can be predicted from the marker allele frequencies. Genomic selection is likely to lead to a more rapid decline in the selection response than phenotypic selection unless new markers are continually added to the prediction of breeding value. A method to find the optimum index to maximise long term selection response is derived. This index varies the weight given to a marker according to its frequency such that markers where the favourable allele has low frequency receive more weight in the index.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 682 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 1%
Brazil 6 <1%
France 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 10 1%
Unknown 646 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 169 25%
Researcher 130 19%
Student > Master 98 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 53 8%
Student > Bachelor 30 4%
Other 102 15%
Unknown 100 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 449 66%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 12 2%
Mathematics 12 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 1%
Other 30 4%
Unknown 128 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,171,774
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Genetica
#63
of 713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,316
of 82,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetica
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 713 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them