↓ Skip to main content

Colony productivity of the paper wasp Polistes snelleni: Comparison between cool-temperate and warm-temperate populations

Overview of attention for article published in Insectes Sociaux, September 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Colony productivity of the paper wasp Polistes snelleni: Comparison between cool-temperate and warm-temperate populations
Published in
Insectes Sociaux, September 2001
DOI 10.1007/pl00001775
Authors

K. Inagawa, J. Kojima, K. Sayama, K. Tsuchida

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 5%
United States 1 5%
Poland 1 5%
Unknown 17 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 15%
Student > Master 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 80%
Mathematics 1 5%
Unknown 3 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Insectes Sociaux
#354
of 1,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,139
of 40,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insectes Sociaux
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.