↓ Skip to main content

麻疹ウイルスの感染経路と現状

Overview of attention for article published in Uirusu, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
麻疹ウイルスの感染経路と現状
Published in
Uirusu, January 2017
DOI 10.2222/jsv.67.17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keiko Tanaka-Taya

Abstract

A large-scale national measles epidemic occurred among mainly in teenagers and young adults in 2007. MHLW announced ''Special infectious disease prevention guidelines for measles'' (issued on 28 December 2007; Revised issued on 30 March 2013), and Japan decided the elimination target year was fiscal year (FY) 2015. In 2008, it continued to be a large-scale nation epidemic exceeding 10,000 cases, and a large number of 0 to 1 year old infants, teenagers and young adults were suffering. Many cases were unvaccinated, single dose vaccination or unknown vaccination history. The number of measles cases has declined dramatically since 2009, and the measles virus of genotype D5, which was the indigenous strain in Japan, was not detected at the end of May 2010. Regional epidemics were approved in 2011 and 2014, starting from imported cases from overseas, but it ended early. Since 2006, a two-dose routine vaccination regimen of measles rubella combined (MR) vaccine has started, moreover in the 5 years from fiscal 2008, the second dose of MR vaccine for junior high school students and high school students was periodically inoculated and immunization strengthened for teens was done. As a result, antibody positive rate of 95% or more is maintained in all age groups over 2 years old. In March 2015, Japan's measles elimination was certified by the WHO Western Pacific Regional Office. In 2017, outbreaks occurred in adults originating from imported cases from Asia or Europe, but early termination declarations have been made by aggressive measures by local public health centers/institutes. The annual number of reported cases after measles elimination certification is less than 200 cases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 16%
Student > Master 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 16%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,377,084
of 25,046,511 outputs
Outputs from Uirusu
#166
of 203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,405
of 432,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Uirusu
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,046,511 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.