↓ Skip to main content

Widespread occurrence of the Tc1 transposon family: Tc1-like transposons from teleost fish

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Genetics and Genomics, November 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 3,318)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
5 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Widespread occurrence of the Tc1 transposon family: Tc1-like transposons from teleost fish
Published in
Molecular Genetics and Genomics, November 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf00282750
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony D. Radice, Bozena Bugaj, David H. A. Fitch, Scott W. Emmons

Abstract

We characterized five transposable elements from fish: one from zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio), one from rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri), and three from Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). All are closely similar in structure to the Tc1 transposon of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. A comparison of 17 Tc1-like transposons from species representing three phyla (nematodes, arthropods, and chordates) showed that these elements make up a highly conserved transposon family. Most are close to 1.7 kb in length, have inverted terminal repeats, have conserved terminal nucleotides, and each contains a single gene encoding similar polypeptides. The phylogenetic relationships of the transposons were reconstructed from the amino acid sequences of the conceptual proteins and from DNA sequences. The elements are highly diverged and have evidently inhibited the genomes of these diverse species for a long time. To account for the data, it is not necessary to invoke recent horizontal transmission.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Czechia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 53 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Chemistry 3 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,811,298
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#40
of 3,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#811
of 20,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,318 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.