↓ Skip to main content

Vegetation Type Affects the Relationship Between Soil Carbon to Nitrogen Ratio and Nitrogen Leaching

Overview of attention for article published in Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Vegetation Type Affects the Relationship Between Soil Carbon to Nitrogen Ratio and Nitrogen Leaching
Published in
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, July 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11270-006-9177-z
Authors

E. C. Rowe, C. D. Evans, B. A. Emmett, B. Reynolds, R. C. Helliwell, M. C. Coull, C. J. Curtis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Taiwan 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 57 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 31%
Researcher 17 27%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Professor 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 23 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2015.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
#534
of 2,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,586
of 95,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.