↓ Skip to main content

Computational Dosimetry and Treatment Planning Considerations for Neutron Capture Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, March 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Computational Dosimetry and Treatment Planning Considerations for Neutron Capture Therapy
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, March 2003
DOI 10.1023/a:1023241022546
Authors

David W. Nigg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Student > Master 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 3 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 19%
Physics and Astronomy 2 13%
Engineering 2 13%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2013.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#1,230
of 3,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,142
of 62,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,257 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.