↓ Skip to main content

Calcium spikes in a leech nonspiking neuron

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Calcium spikes in a leech nonspiking neuron
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, November 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00359-008-0393-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorena Rela, Sung Min Yang, Lidia Szczupak

Abstract

The NS neurons are nonspiking cells, present as pairs in each midbody ganglion of the leech nervous system, which display a very extensive arborization. They were shown to regulate the coactivation of motoneurons. Here we have investigated the electrophysiological properties of these neurons under the hypothesis that transmission along the extensive neurites requires the aid of voltage-dependent conductances. The results indicate that NS neurons respond to electrical stimulation with a spike-like event, which was not an all-or-none but rather a graded phenomenon that depended on the intensity and duration of the electrical stimulus. The spike-like response was activated at a membrane potential of approximately -50 mV; its amplitude was a logarithmic function of the extracellular Ca2+ concentration and was unaffected by a broad range of changes in the extracellular Na+ concentration; intracellular application of tetraethylammonium (TEA) caused a large increase in its amplitude and duration. These data indicate that NS neurons bear voltage-dependent low-threshold Ca2+ and TEA-sensitive K+ conductances that could contribute to shaping synaptic signals, or transmission along the extensive neuritic tree.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 20%
Engineering 2 13%
Psychology 2 13%
Computer Science 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#6,764,072
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#401
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,557
of 169,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.