↓ Skip to main content

Advances in enhanced biological phosphorus removal: From micro to macro scale

Overview of attention for article published in Water Research, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
986 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
808 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advances in enhanced biological phosphorus removal: From micro to macro scale
Published in
Water Research, April 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2007.02.030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian Oehmen, Paulo C. Lemos, Gilda Carvalho, Zhiguo Yuan, Jürg Keller, Linda L. Blackall, Maria A.M. Reis

Abstract

The enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) process has been implemented in many wastewater treatment plants worldwide. While the EBPR process is indeed capable of efficient phosphorus (P) removal performance, disturbances and prolonged periods of insufficient P removal have been observed at full-scale plants on numerous occasions under conditions that are seemingly favourable for EBPR. Recent studies in this field have utilised a wide range of approaches to address this problem, from studying the microorganisms that are primarily responsible for or detrimental to this process, to determining their biochemical pathways and developing mathematical models that facilitate better prediction of process performance. The overall goal of each of these studies is to obtain a more detailed insight into how the EBPR process works, where the best way of achieving this objective is through linking together the information obtained using these different approaches. This review paper critically assesses the recent advances that have been achieved in this field, particularly relating to the areas of EBPR microbiology, biochemistry, process operation and process modelling. Potential areas for future research are also proposed. Although previous research in this field has undoubtedly improved our level of understanding, it is clear that much remains to be learned about the process, as many unanswered questions still remain. One of the challenges appears to be the integration of the existing and growing scientific knowledge base with the observations and applications in practice, which this paper hopes to partially achieve.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 808 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 <1%
Denmark 6 <1%
Portugal 4 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 775 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 173 21%
Student > Master 163 20%
Researcher 91 11%
Student > Bachelor 73 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 4%
Other 108 13%
Unknown 169 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 184 23%
Engineering 150 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 97 12%
Chemical Engineering 41 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 5%
Other 92 11%
Unknown 207 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,301,158
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Water Research
#482
of 11,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,812
of 79,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Research
#1
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,997 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.