↓ Skip to main content

Environmental distribution and population biology of Candidatus Accumulibacter, a primary agent of biological phosphorus removal

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Microbiology, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Environmental distribution and population biology of Candidatus Accumulibacter, a primary agent of biological phosphorus removal
Published in
Environmental Microbiology, July 2008
DOI 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01690.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Brook Peterson, Falk Warnecke, Julita Madejska, Katherine D. McMahon, Philip Hugenholtz

Abstract

Members of the uncultured bacterial genus Candidatus Accumulibacter are capable of intracellular accumulation of inorganic phosphate in activated sludge wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) performing enhanced biological phosphorus removal, but were also recently shown to inhabit freshwater and estuarine sediments. Additionally, metagenomic sequencing of two bioreactor cultures enriched in Candidatus Accumulibacter, but housed on separate continents, revealed the potential for global dispersal of particular Candidatus Accumulibacter strains, which we hypothesize is facilitated by the ability of Candidatus Accumulibacter to persist in environmental habitats. In the current study, we used sequencing of a phylogenetic marker, the ppk1 gene, to characterize Candidatus Accumulibacter populations in diverse environments, at varying distances from WWTPs. We discovered several new lineages of Candidatus Accumulibacter which had not previously been detected in WWTPs, and also uncovered new diversity and structure within previously detected lineages. Habitat characteristics were found to be a key determinant of Candidatus Accumulibacter lineage distribution while, as predicted, geographic distance played little role in limiting dispersal on a regional scale. However, on a local scale, enrichment of particular Candidatus Accumulibacter lineages in WWTP appeared to impact local environmental populations. These results provide evidence of ecological differences among Candidatus Accumulibacter lineages.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Denmark 3 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 98 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 21%
Researcher 21 19%
Student > Master 15 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 28 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 25%
Engineering 16 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Chemical Engineering 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 21 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2011.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiology
#2,351
of 4,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,665
of 86,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiology
#14
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,601 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.