↓ Skip to main content

The deformation pattern and fault rate in the Tianshan Mountains inferred from GPS observations

Overview of attention for article published in Science China Earth Sciences, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
The deformation pattern and fault rate in the Tianshan Mountains inferred from GPS observations
Published in
Science China Earth Sciences, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11430-008-0090-8
Authors

ShaoMin Yang, Jie Li, Qi Wang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 2%
China 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 44 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 28%
Researcher 11 23%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 33 70%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Unknown 12 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2011.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Science China Earth Sciences
#338
of 543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,651
of 95,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Earth Sciences
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them