You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early-Stage Visual Processing and Cortical Amplification Deficits in Schizophrenia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Psychiatry, May 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1001/archpsyc.62.5.495 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pamela D. Butler, Vance Zemon, Isaac Schechter, Alice M. Saperstein, Matthew J. Hoptman, Kelvin O. Lim, Nadine Revheim, Gail Silipo, Daniel C. Javitt |
| Abstract |
Patients with schizophrenia show deficits in early-stage visual processing, potentially reflecting dysfunction of the magnocellular visual pathway. The magnocellular system operates normally in a nonlinear amplification mode mediated by glutamatergic (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptors. Investigating magnocellular dysfunction in schizophrenia therefore permits evaluation of underlying etiologic hypotheses. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 217 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 22% |
| Researcher | 53 | 22% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
| Professor | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 51 | 21% |
| Unknown | 33 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 83 | 34% |
| Neuroscience | 46 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 9% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Unknown | 42 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Psychiatry
#4,017
of 5,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,544
of 70,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Psychiatry
#18
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 70.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.