↓ Skip to main content

Having a Male Co-Twin Masculinizes Mental Rotation Performance in Females

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Science, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Having a Male Co-Twin Masculinizes Mental Rotation Performance in Females
Published in
Psychological Science, June 2010
DOI 10.1177/0956797610376075
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eero Vuoksimaa, Jaakko Kaprio, William S. Kremen, Laura Hokkanen, Richard J. Viken, Annamari Tuulio-Henriksson, Richard J. Rose

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 72 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 22%
Student > Bachelor 16 21%
Researcher 10 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 48%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 13 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,521,817
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Science
#3,235
of 4,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,561
of 109,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science
#38
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 85.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.