↓ Skip to main content

First clinical experience with a new non-indwelling voice prosthesis (Provox® NID™) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Oto-Laryngologica (Supplement), July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
First clinical experience with a new non-indwelling voice prosthesis (Provox® NID™) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy
Published in
Acta Oto-Laryngologica (Supplement), July 2009
DOI 10.1080/00016480510043486
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelli Hancock, Brooke Houghton, Corina J. Van As-Brooks, William Coman

Abstract

The new Provox NID non-indwelling voice prosthesis investigated in this study provides a good option for laryngectomized patients using non-indwelling voice prostheses and can potentially improve safety and increase patients' satisfaction with their voice and speech.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Other 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Other 7 26%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Unspecified 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Acta Oto-Laryngologica (Supplement)
#266
of 1,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,787
of 121,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Oto-Laryngologica (Supplement)
#135
of 723 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,824 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 723 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.