Title |
Sap flow of the southern conifer, Agathis australis during wet and dry summers
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trees, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00468-015-1164-9 |
Authors |
Cate Macinnis-Ng, Sarah Wyse, Andrew Veale, Luitgard Schwendenmann, Mike Clearwater |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 5 | 63% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 50% |
Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 44 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 20% |
Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 44% |
Environmental Science | 15 | 33% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 6 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2016.
All research outputs
#6,432,468
of 24,527,858 outputs
Outputs from Trees
#77
of 576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,295
of 367,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trees
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,527,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 576 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.