↓ Skip to main content

Expression of ENOD40 during tomato plant development

Overview of attention for article published in Planta, September 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Expression of ENOD40 during tomato plant development
Published in
Planta, September 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00425-003-1081-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ingrid Vleghels, Jan Hontelez, Ana Ribeiro, Paul Fransz, Ton Bisseling, Henk Franssen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 32%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 21%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 21%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2010.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#674
of 2,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,765
of 56,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,980 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.