| Title |
Brief review: Neuromuscular monitoring: an update for the clinician
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf03021901 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas M. Hemmerling, Nhien Le |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Researcher | 12 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 9% |
| Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 29% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 63% |
| Engineering | 8 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,586,083
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1,392
of 2,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,310
of 168,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.