↓ Skip to main content

Food web manipulation in Lake Zwemlust: Positive and negative effects during the first two years

Overview of attention for article published in Aquatic Ecology, March 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Food web manipulation in Lake Zwemlust: Positive and negative effects during the first two years
Published in
Aquatic Ecology, March 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf02286424
Authors

E. Van Donk, R. D. Gulati, M. P. Grimm, M. P. Grimm

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 21 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Other 2 9%
Other 6 26%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 57%
Environmental Science 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 1 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2012.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Ecology
#102
of 549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,995
of 13,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Ecology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 549 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them