↓ Skip to main content

Callous-Unemotional Traits and Subtypes of Conduct Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, September 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
227 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
Title
Callous-Unemotional Traits and Subtypes of Conduct Disorder
Published in
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, September 1999
DOI 10.1023/a:1021803005547
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul J. Frick, Mesha Ellis

Abstract

There has been growing consensus that children with conduct disorder (CD) constitute a very heterogeneous group containing children who vary substantially on the development, course, and causes of the disorder. While many have recognized the importance of this heterogeneity for developing better causal theories and for developing more effective treatments, there has been little consensus as to the best way to subtype children with CD. In this paper, we review a number of approaches to subtyping, each with some evidence for its validity for certain purposes. We focus on two recent approaches that have great potential for integrating past subtyping approaches and for advancing causal theory. The first approach is the division of children with CD into those with a childhood onset to their severe antisocial behavior and those with an adolescent onset to their behavior. The second approach is to designate children within the childhood-onset group who show callous and unemotional traits, which is analogous to adult conceptualizations of psychopathy. Both approaches help designate children who many show different causal processes underlying their severe aggressive and antisocial behavior, and who may warrant different approaches to treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Italy 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 199 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 20%
Student > Bachelor 35 16%
Student > Master 31 14%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 10%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 32 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 126 59%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 7%
Social Sciences 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 38 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#260
of 399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,057
of 35,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 399 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them