↓ Skip to main content

New Electroweak Formulation Fundamentally Accounting for the Effect Known as “Maximal Parity-Violation”

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Theoretical Physics, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
New Electroweak Formulation Fundamentally Accounting for the Effect Known as “Maximal Parity-Violation”
Published in
International Journal of Theoretical Physics, June 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10773-006-9168-2
Authors

G. Ziino

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 50%
Physics and Astronomy 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Theoretical Physics
#112
of 1,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,648
of 64,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Theoretical Physics
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,810 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.