↓ Skip to main content

The reproductive division of labour in the queenless ponerine antRhytidoponera sp. 12

Overview of attention for article published in Insectes Sociaux, June 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
The reproductive division of labour in the queenless ponerine antRhytidoponera sp. 12
Published in
Insectes Sociaux, June 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf02223826
Authors

C. P. Peeters

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
South Africa 1 3%
Israel 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 28 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Master 4 12%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 76%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Psychology 1 3%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2015.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Insectes Sociaux
#323
of 966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,397
of 12,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insectes Sociaux
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them