↓ Skip to main content

Differential amygdala responses to happy and fearful facial expressions depend on selective attention

Overview of attention for article published in NeuroImage, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differential amygdala responses to happy and fearful facial expressions depend on selective attention
Published in
NeuroImage, January 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark A. Williams, Francis McGlone, David F. Abbott, Jason B. Mattingley

Abstract

Facial expressions of emotion elicit increased activity in the human amygdala. Such increases are particularly evident for expressions that convey potential threat to the observer, and arise even when the face is masked from awareness. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine whether the amygdala responds differentially to threatening (fearful) versus nonthreatening (happy) facial expressions depending on whether the face is attended or actively ignored. In separate runs, participants were cued to attend to a face or a house within semitransparent, spatially overlaid composite pairs, presented either side of fixation, and were required to perform a demanding same/different judgment. We found significant attentional modulation of activity in category-specific 'face' (fusiform gyrus) and 'place' (parahippocampal gyrus) regions, with activity in each area increasing selectively when its preferred stimulus was attended versus ignored. In contrast, activity in the amygdala differed according to the valence of the facial expression and the category of the attended stimulus. For happy faces, activity in the amygdala was greater in the attend-face than in the attend-house condition, whereas for fearful faces, activity was greater in the attend-house than in the attend-face condition. We conclude that differential amygdala responses to fearful versus happy facial expressions are tuned by mechanisms of attention and that the amygdala gives preference to potentially threatening stimuli under conditions of inattention.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
United States 4 2%
Germany 3 1%
Australia 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 214 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 21%
Student > Master 24 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 20 8%
Professor 18 8%
Other 55 23%
Unknown 20 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 122 51%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 9%
Neuroscience 18 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 1%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 31 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#6,651
of 12,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,862
of 151,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#28
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.