| Title |
Surgical therapy of neuroendocrine neoplasm with hepatic metastasis: patient selection and prognosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00423-015-1277-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
F. M. Watzka, C. Fottner, M. Miederer, A. Schad, M. M. Weber, G. Otto, H. Lang, T. J. Musholt |
| Abstract |
Patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) develop hepatic metastases in 50-95 %. The aims of this study were to evaluate the outcome/prognosis of patients following hepatic surgery and to identify predictive factors for the selection of patient that benefit from hepatic tumor resection. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 17% |
| Professor | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 5 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 75% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2016.
All research outputs
#17,747,692
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#716
of 1,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,214
of 385,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#9
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.