↓ Skip to main content

Thinking in action: thought made visible in contemporary dance

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Processing, August 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
Title
Thinking in action: thought made visible in contemporary dance
Published in
Cognitive Processing, August 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10339-005-0014-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Stevens, Shirley McKechnie

Abstract

Contemporary dance-movement deliberately and systematically cultivated for its own sake-is examined in the light of the procedural and declarative view of long-term knowledge. We begin with a description of two settings in which new works of contemporary dance are created and performed. Although non-verbal, contemporary dance can be a language declared through movement and stillness of the body. Ideas for new movement material come from objects, events or imaginings that are spoken, seen, heard, imagined, or felt. Declared through movement, the idea becomes visible. Communication in dance involves general psychological processes such as direct visual perception of motion and force, motor simulation via mirror neurons, and implicit learning of movement vocabularies and grammars. Creating and performing dance appear to involve both procedural and declarative knowledge. The latter includes the role of episodic memory in performance and occasional labelling of movement phrases and sections in rehearsal. Procedural knowledge in dance is augmented by expressive nuance, feeling and communicative intent that is not characteristic of other movement-based procedural tasks. Having delineated lexical and grammatical components in dance, neural mechanisms are identified based on Ullman's (Ullman in Cognition 92:231-270, 2004) alignment of lexical knowledge with declarative memory and mental grammar with procedural memory. We conclude with suggestions for experiments to test these assumptions that concern thought in action in composition, performance and appreciation of contemporary dance.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Portugal 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 128 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 21%
Student > Bachelor 21 15%
Student > Master 18 13%
Researcher 12 9%
Professor 10 7%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 29 21%
Psychology 27 19%
Social Sciences 13 9%
Neuroscience 9 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 5%
Other 31 22%
Unknown 24 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Processing
#105
of 338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,313
of 58,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Processing
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 338 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them