↓ Skip to main content

Optimization and performance of restoration schemes for wide-area teletraffic networks

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Network and Systems Management, September 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 125)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Optimization and performance of restoration schemes for wide-area teletraffic networks
Published in
Journal of Network and Systems Management, September 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf02138930
Authors

D. Medhi, R. Khurana

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,926,100
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Network and Systems Management
#27
of 125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,321
of 24,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Network and Systems Management
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 24,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them