↓ Skip to main content

A new data structure for representing sorted lists

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Informatica, June 1982
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 153)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
A new data structure for representing sorted lists
Published in
Acta Informatica, June 1982
DOI 10.1007/bf00288968
Authors

Scott Huddleston, Kurt Mehlhorn

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 67%
Researcher 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 4 67%
Mathematics 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,623,822
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Acta Informatica
#9
of 153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#675
of 7,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Informatica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 153 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them