Title |
Quantifying variation in δ13C and δ15N isotopes within and between feathers and individuals: Is one sample enough?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Marine Biology, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00227-015-2618-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
W. James Grecian, Rona A. R. McGill, Richard A. Phillips, Peter G. Ryan, Robert W. Furness |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 8 | 40% |
New Zealand | 2 | 10% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 5% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
Ireland | 1 | 5% |
Faroe Islands | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 60% |
Scientists | 8 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
Portugal | 2 | 2% |
Mexico | 2 | 2% |
Israel | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Namibia | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 110 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 28% |
Researcher | 24 | 19% |
Student > Master | 21 | 17% |
Other | 5 | 4% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
Other | 25 | 20% |
Unknown | 9 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 69 | 56% |
Environmental Science | 22 | 18% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Unknown | 14 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2015.
All research outputs
#1,873,315
of 24,945,754 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#212
of 3,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,418
of 397,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#5
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,945,754 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.