| Title |
Nanoencapsulation Techniques for Food Bioactive Components: A Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Food and Bioprocess Technology, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11947-012-0944-0 |
| Authors |
P. N. Ezhilarasi, P. Karthik, N. Chhanwal, C. Anandharamakrishnan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1298 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 210 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 200 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 146 | 11% |
| Researcher | 99 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 80 | 6% |
| Other | 198 | 15% |
| Unknown | 385 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 268 | 20% |
| Engineering | 167 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 133 | 10% |
| Chemical Engineering | 63 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 58 | 4% |
| Other | 169 | 13% |
| Unknown | 460 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2017.
All research outputs
#640,203
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Food and Bioprocess Technology
#5
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,294
of 169,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food and Bioprocess Technology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them